Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, Yards. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Advancement and you will Person Choices, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Yards. (2000). The spot away from connection in person mating. Overview of Standard Mindset, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, Good. (2002). Internet sites paradox reviewed. Diary from Societal Things, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Sites contradiction: A personal tech you to decrease personal engagement and you may mental better-being? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, R.Meters., & Industries, J. M officielt websted. (2001). Amount, timing, and time of marriages and you can divorces. Current People Reports, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: U.S. Census Agency, 2005).
Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional study regarding closeness, passion, and you will connection: Analysis the fresh assumptions of your own triangular concept out-of love. Psychological Accounts, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.step 3.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Effect most readily useful on creating tough: Personal comparisons within intimate matchmaking. Log from Character and you may Social Mindset, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. Good., & Gailliot, Meters. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The fresh implicit knowledge off romantic competition. Log of Personality and Personal Mindset, 97(1), 74–87.
An effective. (2001)mitment and matchmaking restoration systems
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A good., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automated inattention so you’re able to glamorous selection: The newest progressed therapy off relationships maintenance. Progression and you will Human Decisions, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. E. (1981). Sequential investigation away from conflict and you can agreement when you look at the upset and you will nondistressed marital people. Diary regarding Consulting and you can Logical Mindset, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. A., Environmentally friendly, A. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Relationships formation on the web: What is the larger destination? Diary out of Social Activities, 58(1), 9–29.
The many benefits of positive illusions: Idealization while the framework of fulfillment inside the close matchmaking
Neff, L. Good., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-evaluation purposes when you look at the intimate matchmaking: A type of in the world enhancement and particular verification. Inside the P. Noller & J. Good. Feeney (Eds.), Information ents about study of pair telecommunications (pp. 32–58). Ny, NY: Cambridge College Force.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the customer-specialist thread through the contact from connection concept. Psychotherapy: Concept, Research, Habit, Education, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). New societal overseeing program: Enhanced awareness to social signs once the an adaptive response to personal different. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The newest social outcast: Ostracism, societal exclusion, getting rejected, and you will bullying (pp. 213–226). Ny, NY: Mindset Press.
Penetrate, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). Globally and you will certain relational designs on contact with public interactions. Diary of Personality and you can Personal Therapy, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A good., Tran, S., ). Attachment and you will guidance looking to into the intimate relationships. Identity and you will Social Mindset Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and you may certain attachment representations in the adulthood: Will there be a love?. Log Regarding Societal And private Relationships, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. When you look at the J. Harvey & A great. Wenzel (Eds.), Romantic close dating: Fix and improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A good. D. (2000). Projection individually impression among spouses because the a purpose of the fresh resemblance in their mutual experiences. Character And Public Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Results of salience out of extrinsic benefits toward preference and you may enjoying. Diary out of Identification and you will Personal Therapy, 38(3), 453–460.