1. Yet, during the genealogy, everyone knowthat for every rule there is certainly a difference. Good vexing part ofgenealogy is the fact nobody extremely understands just how to apply the brand new exceptions orrules having any decisive adjective such as for example always, maybe, probably,almost certainly, an such like. It would be fascinating in the event that here other advice ofjointures getting made a-year otherwise a couple just after a well-known marriage date.
2. Could there be a keen extant dispensation into the matrimony of ElizabethClifford and you can Sir Ralph Bowes who have been 3rd cousins through Henry Fitzhugh,third Lord Fitzhugh otherwise last cousins, shortly after taken off the newest 5th LordClifford? Who restrict its matrimony time.
Arthur
Allegedly, if good dispensation was needed and you may provided, it can havebeen of the one of the following, and may appear in the fresh correspondingregister guide, in the event it survives:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop away from York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop out-of Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop out of York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop regarding Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop regarding Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop out of Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop regarding Carlisle 1509-1520
5. Should your 10th Lord Clifford really does wed at the beginning of 1487 [say January] andhas Age afterwards where season, really does new chronology perhaps not really works?
John palms?
E born from inside the late 1487, Henry born from inside the 1488/9, Joan in the ,etcetera. completing the brand new brands of your send out of . In the event the (a) thechronology nonetheless functions; and you can (b) their marriage piece wasn’t reasonable; thenwe simply have this new 1505 pedigree away from Henry VII’s that is in oppositionto the newest conjecture that she is actually a valid daughter.
six. Concerning your 1505 pedigree: Will be Clifford daughters the new onlyknown Henry VII affairs omitted? Have there been others? If that’s the case,won’t one mirror improperly on this subject file given that a source?
From contrasting I’ve created from the new c.1505 Henry VII Affairs pedigreeswith the fresh new 1480-1500 Visitation of the Northern pedigrees, that are
Regarding the c.1505 Relationships pedigrees, the brand new Clifford children are not listedin good Clifford pedigree, but instead regarding the St. John pedigree. Since the I’mnot used to the fresh new St. John family, after the is the guidance asit appears in the c.1505 pedigree, while the extracted from the 1834 Coll. Ideal. etGen. post. The fresh new phrasing when you look at the quotations is strictly since it looks inthe 1834 post (pp. 310-311).
“Zero. XII.”From my Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Rod, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess regarding Somerset hot Chandler, IN girl had around three husbands.” By “John Duke ofSomerset” she had “My Woman the new King’s Mother.” who’d “The new King.” whohad “Prince “By “Sir Oliver Saint John, basic spouse.” she got step 3 daus & 2 sons:
Good. “Edith, wedded so you can Geoffrey Pole from Buckinghamshire.” They’d:A1. “Sir Richard Rod, Knt. married for the Lady Margaret, dau. from theDuke out of Clarence.” That they had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, wedded to help you Ralph Verney, Esq.” They’d: “John Verney.—– [youngster, unnamed]. ——-[a new child, unnamed].”
B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He’d four people:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who had “Five daughters and oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. so you can Harry Lord Clifford.” That they had “Jane. Mabill.Henry, young man and you may heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “E, married to help you Thomas Kent, Esq. regarding Lincolnshire.”B4. “A good Nun regarding Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”
C. “Dame Mary, married so you’re able to Sir Richard Frognall.” They had:C1. “Edmond Frognall and his brethren and you can sistren.” Which have issueindicated, however titled.C2. “Elizabeth, wedded to help you Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”
D. “E, married first to the Lord Zouche; just after on the LordScrope out-of Bolton.” Issue:D1. [of the Zouche] ” Catesby.” That they had:”E. George. John. William.”D2. [from the Scrope] ” Conyers.” That have issueindicated however titled.
Margaret Duchess regarding Somerset, because of the “Lionel Lord Welles, history partner.”had: “John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. off K. Edward IV.” andthey had “Age.”